LOGOLOGOLOGOLOGO
  • About us
    • What we do
    • Who we are
      • Governance
      • Staff
      • Vacancies
  • Members
    • EuropaBio Members
    • About Membership
  • How we work
    • Healthcare Biotechnology Council
      • Patient BioForum
      • Study – Impact of the EU’s General Pharmaceutical Legislation
    • Industrial Biotechnology Council
      • EFIB
      • Microorganisms
    • National Associations Council
    • SME Platform
    • Biomanufacturing Platform
      • Biotechnology in our Lives
  • Activities
    • 25 Years of Innovation
    • The EU Biotech Act
    • European Biotech Week
    • EU Projects
      • PRIMED Project
      • APROVALS Project
  • News & Events
    • News
    • Events
  • Library
Become a member
✕

EuropaBio’s response to the EC consultation on patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare

20/07/2021
NEWS RELEASE

Brussels, 20 July 2021

EuropaBio responded to the European Commission’s (hereafter, EC) Public consultation on the Directive 2011/24/EU on patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare. The Directive sets out the conditions under which a patient may travel to another EU country to receive medical care and reimbursement. The EC aims at assessing whether the EU rules give patients access to safe and high-quality healthcare in another EU country and encourage cooperation between national healthcare providers, also on rare diseases and European Reference Networks.

EuropaBio, representing biotechnology and biopharmaceutical medicine developers sees the EU legislation on cross-border healthcare as an important instrument to ensure patient access to the best available care.

EuropaBio believes, that sometimes, the approval timelines for cross-border treatment are long. In many countries, the approval process is opaque with no possibility to appeal denials.

When it comes to the fees, many hospitals discriminate against cross-border patients with mark-ups on the fees charged to local patients. Also, very often hospitals need to wait months or years for reimbursement and face significant budget impact when not paid. This creates a disincentive for treating cross-border patients.

There are also difficulties in cross-border participation to clinical trials. Due to the upfront payments imposed by the Directive, cross-border treatment with advanced therapies appears possible only through the ‘S2 route’ that is difficult to apply and not aligned in all Member States.

For many rare and complex genetic diseases, the treatment of EU patients abroad is often the only option. As the number of patients can be extremely limited, it is not possible to have a dedicated treatment centre in each Member State. For this reason, a well-functioning EU cross-border healthcare legislation is crucial to ensure patients’ access to specialised treatments and novel therapies when these are not available in their home country.

Proposals for improvement

• Capped approval timelines for cross-border treatment.

• More transparent approval process for reimbursement requests, which is open to patient representatives.

• Where a Member State does not have a treatment centre, cross-border treatment of rare diseases should get a defined and accelerated pathway for approval. Pan-EU funding would help or accelerated reimbursement once a rare disease therapy is available in enough Member States.

• Banning the practice of many hospitals to discriminate against cross-border patients with mark-ups on the fees charged to local patients.

• Mechanisms to allow innovative payment models to function across borders should be implemented.

• Better and practical information should reach all stakeholders (HCPs, patients, companies, social security entities) to secure the best treatment

• Reliable and accessible information is needed on cross-border participation to clinical trials, e.g. through multi-stakeholder, multi-national recommendations with information about existing options and best practices.

• Establish Europe-wide patient registries to facilitate long-term patient follow-up.

• Processing timelines for obtaining prior authorisation using the ‘S2 Form’ should be aligned across the EU. The time it takes to obtain a prior authorisation for the treatment of rare diseases should be particularly shortened to meet the high needs of rare disease patients.

• Specific funds should be allocated to countries with restricted budgets in particular as regards access to novel advanced therapies. EU guidelines on which advanced treatments should be approved to ensure harmonised access across EU would be helpful, with clarification on process for prior authorisation, clear timelines for decision making and reimbursement.

• Improved HTA coordination to avoid multiple submissions and enable patient access.

The COVID-19 crisis has shown that Member States can work together to provide efficient patient care across borders. The Commission stimulated cross-border treatment of Covid-19 patients through issuing facilitating guidelines in 2020. If the same spirit of collaboration were applied to cross-border healthcare in general, it would help ensure all EU patients have equal access to novel treatments.

Please find EuropaBio’s full response to the Consultation here (to be included after July 27).

EuropaBio’s response to the EC consultation on patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare


Download
Share
Communications Team
Communications Team

Related posts

14/07/2025

EuropaBio Annual Report 2025


Read more
11/07/2025

Industrial Decarbonisation Accelerator Act – EuropaBio Position


Read more
07/07/2025

EuropaBio Position on the Critical Medicines Act


Read more

Important links

  • Public Consultation Response to the European Commission’s 28th Regime proposal
  • EuropaBio Annual Report 2025

Categories in our Newsroom

EBIO-white

EuropaBio represents corporate and associate members across sectors, plus national and regional biotechnology associations which, in turn, represent over 5000 biotech companies, 4600 out of them are SMEs.

Contact us

Extra links

Members
Staff
Privacy policy
Legal & cookies
Events
Newsroom

Become a member

Media pack

© 2025 Europabio. All Rights Reserved. Designed by EYAS
Become a member

Vitamin B2

The biomanufacturing of Vitamin B2 led to the reduction of 75% of fossil raw materials and 50% operating costs, compared to the chemical process. Vitamin B2 is used in the food, feed or healthcare sectors.

Insulin

Insulin is one of the most widely known biopharmaceutical. Biotechnology revolutionised its manufacturing process and led to the development of new types of insulin through r-DNA technology.

Detergents

Enzymes and biosurfactancts are alternative ingredients that improve the performance of detergents, while leading to water and energy savings and reductions in CO2 emissions and water toxicity.

Clothes

Clothes made from alternative fibres produced by microorganisms can be 8x stronger than steel, 100% recyclable, biodegradable and replace fossil-fuel based or resource-intensive textiles.

Algal Omega 3

Algal Omega-3 is an innovative feed product for aquaculture. It reduces the impact on climate change by 30-40% compared to fish oil and saves 60 tons of wild fish for every ton of Algal Omega-3 used.

Cheese

Cheese is a vegetarian product thanks to biotechnology. Biotechnology is also essential to produce lactose- or cholesterol-free cheese, as well as alternative proteins.