We, European Associations representing a wide number of economic sectors affected directly or indirectly by comitology rules, re-iterate the request for timely, reliable authorisations of safe products, based on the best available science from the EU’s own risk assessment agencies. Such decisions are central for innovation, continued investments, jobs and growth, as well as consumer confidence and safety in the EU. Innovation, in turn, is critical to achieving the goals of the European Green Deal and the EU’s industrial strategy.
We regret that the changes to the comitology system proposed by the Commission would not help on any of the above goals, nor are they likely to promote social acceptance of innovation. Instead, the proposed changes would make the processes for product authorisations even more complex and less predictable.
The Plenary of the European Parliament is expected to vote on 16 December 2020 on an amended version of the Commission’s proposal which would revert the logic from currently ‘approve when safe’ to ‘approve only when popular’. Concretely, amendments 5, 7, and 16 would enable a minority of Member States to block authorisations of products, even if their safety is confirmed by the risk assessment agencies. This would make authorisations of certain products de facto impossible and would undermine science-based decision-making processes.
Therefore, we disagree with the proposed comitology reform and urge decision-makers in particular to reject the legal affairs committee’s amendments 5, 7 and 16.